The Lurkdragon's Lair

twin-crossing:

OH MY GOD

(via theazuredolphin)

calverv:

Immediately get announcements stating that several dogs have been struck down.

Giant ticks?

Bit them

Sucked out their blood

Literally within half a second of embarking

I CAN’T EVEN

WHAT

phantomdoodler:

snortrax:

Holy shit, I wonder how many bells that’s worth

9,000

YOU CAN CATCH OARFISH NOW?!

Hnngg stores in town I hope you have some New Leaf available for this weekend

(via theazuredolphin)

inertialreferenceframe:

glamstructed:

theuppitynegras:

robbingthestylescraddle:

Well this could get interesting…

is anyone even still up

oh man

(via darkwizardjamesmason)

dariusalpha:

BOUNTY HUNTER ON CORNERIA

from the commission stream i just finished. FoxyDude wanted an arrange of Star Fox and Super Metroid music. being a fan of the music from both of these, i didn’t hesitate to hop on it with an idea.

DOWNLOAD MP3

DOWNLOAD FLAC

Oh man and it’s even got Green Brinstar~

Wonderful work, Renard!

prestonhymas:

carol-fucking-danvers:

If you say the “A” in LGBTQIA+ is for “Ally” I will personally paint the word “Asexual” on a baseball bat and beat you with it. 

What the hell is LGBTQIA+?

What the fuck is this acronym?

What has this become?

I vote for a name that doesn’t require an entire breath to get through.

Let’s just pick one letter. Y. The Y community. As in, Y don’t we have our fucking rights yet.

(via lesbianpokemontrainer)

toalfact:

blackjackgabbiani:

shadowxxxdragon:

I mean COME ON!! Who decided that powerful dragons were going to be defeated by fucking wimpy ass fairies!!!!!!

Question—why do you think fairies are “wimpy ass”? Fairies are some tough little bastards in pretty much every story you’ll hear, including modern takes. So I don’t understand the basis of your complaint.

OP obviously doesn’t know that in the old stories about fairies, they were some nasty motherfuckers. You didn’t want to fuck with them.

Remember, they’re called fairies because ‘the fair folk’ was just about as much of a compliment as you could give them. Call them beautiful and they’ll kill you for being a brown-noser. Call them ugly and they’ll kill you for being rude.

Besides, we haven’t had a new type since Gen II. It’s good to shake up the balance now and then.

alternativepokemonart:

dangerousthisjackofhearts:

sherbet-holmes:

inthelandofgallifrey:

sherlockjumpedoffbartsand:

mykaobering:

Sometimes when I’m feeling down I like to remind myself that once, on /v/, I sang A Whole New World, as Jigglypuff, with a guy doing a solid impression of Professor Oak.

I LOST IT WHEN THE FUCKING POKEMON STARTED SINGING

WHAT IS AIR

I’M CRYING

GOD FUCKING DAMN IT ALL TO HELL

AMAZING

sky-sanctuary:

I think it’s sad how under-appreciated Amy is. Amy haters seem to only see her as a fangirl, not for who she truly is. They call her obsessive but they don’t see how much she cares for her friends; they don’t see her compassion. Maybe it’s not so obvious in recent games, but it’s there. She’s helped Sonic so many times and is strong and independent, she’s proved this countless times. Basically what I’m trying to say is that Amy is not a useless fangirl, and I wish everyone could see that. I have nothing against people who do dislike her, but for the reason that she is a useless fangirl? Nope nope nope I will write an essay if I need to to prove that wrong.

Amy Rose’s superpower is being unfailing nice to just about everyone and she has saved the world at least once with it. Shadow wouldn’t have helped at the end of SA2 if she hadn’t been chirpy about people at him. That’s also how she got Gamma to break programming - treating him like a person and appealing to his basic goodness. Like I say: nice to just about everyone.

Kind of like how Sonic tends to befriend the hell out of people.

She’s brave, too - she may not have any crazy Chaos powers, but she’s out there helping as and when anyway.

She’s a little (or a lot) immature and could perhaps stand a few other hobbies, that’s all. Amy’s a good character on the balance.

(via groovy-blaze)

video 36: Cute ADORABLE kitten tries to steal dog’s tongue (as seen on Ellen!!) (by dcjanelle)

thatpointlessidiot:

krudman:

I thought to myself when I saw this, “no. This has to be some one being silly. This has to be something some one fabricated to make microsoft look worse and people just aren’t checking the source.”

NOPE. IT’S REAL.

AND IT GOT WORSE:

WHAT.

I want everyone to think long and hard on this information.

This means that you are not buying your games.  You are paying 60+ dollars to rent the games from Microsoft, and they can take their game back whenever they feel like it.

You will not own your game.  You will not own your console.  Essentially, Microsoft is saying “We can disable your games and cut you off from accessing your console whenever we choose to.”  Because a ban that locks your XBox Live account means that you will be locked out from all non-game functionality of the system, and by revoking your ‘licenses’ on all your games associated with your account, they can then disable each and every game you own for the system.  Leaving you with a five hundred dollar cable receiver.  Or, in the case of most users of the console, a five hundred dollar paperweight.

All because you accidentally walked into some online glitch and the rest of the players rage-report you for cheating.

This is unacceptable.  Buy any console but an XBox One.  Do not support Microsoft’s sudden belief that they own everything despite our purchase of it, and we have to prove we’re worthy of being shared with by paying exorbitant fees and jumping through constant hoops and hoping someone doesn’t report us for cheating because we made them mad in an online game.

Tell Microsoft ‘No,’ and do not give them your hard-earned money for what amounts to a video game subscription service with a $500 starting fee and $60+ dollar purchases.

(via toalfact)

caramelzappa:

cowgirltits replied to your post: hiroshimishima replied to your post: gametavern…

Wait for Wind Waker HD

I was considering that. I’ve always loved the visuals of Wind Waker, and the remake looks gorgeous.

How is the actual game? Most discussions I’ve seen about it are people arguing about the toon look, not actually discussing the content.

I found it pretty okay.

No more or less. It’s okay. I’d recommend other Zeldas over it, but I’d recommend it before a heck of a lot of other games.

The sailing mechanic is kinda clunky, but it makes intuitive sense. The pacing is just bad in places, though - there’s a mandatory money-sink mechanic about three quarters through associated with a treasure hunt that’s fiddly as heck.

Inside dungeons, though, it’s a joy for the most part, and the bosses are bright, unique, and satisfying.

Supposedly the remake is going to address some of the clunkiness about the sailing and the aforementioned money sink/treasure hunt quest, so I’d definitely wait for it if you’re interested.

(I have some minor complaints about the story, too - in particular the villain’s backstory just kind of comes off as… I’m not sure of the word. Unnecessary, I guess. Bit like trying to give Ridley a sympathetic backstory; interesting to know but doesn’t excuse anything.

There’s a lot of good in the story, mind, just… that bit just didn’t do anything for me at all.)

Basically I’ve noticed that people who talk about Ecco the Dolphin either Really Get It or Really Don’t Get It and there is no in between here

TAS E.V.O. Search for Eden SNES in 40:31 by FatRatKnight (by webnations)